Always remember the level of force in your response is dictated by the situation. Police officers use the force continuum, a scale of force alternatives, to mediate. What acronym is used to help decide when to move up and down the Use of Force continuum, and what does each letter stand for? Use of Force Continuum: A Debate. When one civilian uses deadly force against another civilian, the results are obviously tragic. However, such an act is.


Author: Ulices Champlin
Country: Andorra
Language: English
Genre: Education
Published: 1 March 2017
Pages: 831
PDF File Size: 28.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.8 Mb
ISBN: 140-4-87077-446-4
Downloads: 10035
Price: Free
Uploader: Ulices Champlin


Use of force continuum

The elements of deadly force Deadly Force — A force that is likely to cause great bodily harm or death. The three requirements for use of deadly force in self-defense are: Ability — The capability or means to cause great bodily harm or death. Opportunity — In a position to cause great bodily harm or death.

Jeopardy use of force continuum An overt threatening move or gesture that could cause great bodily harm or death.

There is no golden rule to cover every situation. The circumstances and variables are normally different and can change. An officer will usually have only seconds use of force continuum make a decision on the street.

Reasonableness Standard Objectively Reasonable: The legal standard used to determine the lawfulness and appropriateness of a use of force is the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The calculus of reasonableness must embody allowance for the fact that officers are often forced to make split-second judgments — in circumstances that are tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving — about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.

The test of reasonableness is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application. The force must be reasonable under the circumstances known to the officer at the time the force was used.

Use of force continuum, the Department examines all uses of force from an objective standard, rather than a use of force continuum standard.

Connor On November 12, Graham, who was a diabetic, felt an insulin reaction coming on and rushed to the store with a friend to get some orange juice.

Lesson 5 – Use of Force – 1

In the midst of all this, he was being watched by Officer Connor, of the Charlotte City Police Department police department. After several other officers arrived, one of them handcuffed Graham.

Eventually, when Connor learned that nothing had happened in the convenience store, the officers drove Graham home and released him. Over the course of the encounter, Graham sustained a broken foot, cuts on his wrists, a bruised forehead and an injured shoulder.

Lesson 5 - Use of Force - 1 ⋆ AEPS

The Supreme Court held that it was irrelevant whether Connor acted in good faith, because the use of force must be judged based on its objective reasonableness.

Suspects who do not resist but follow all commands are compliant. A suspect fails to follow commands and his actions are neutral or defensive, and the use of force continuum does not feel use of force continuum by his actions.

But the officer IS allowed under this second category to use pressure points, control holds, and take-downs. A suspect takes offensive action and to defend himself, the officer must respond with appropriate force to stop, eliminate, or control the threat.


Use of force continuum responses include the use of personal weapons hands, fists, feetbatons, and pepper spray. The officer needs to carefully document articulate those perceptions in the subsequent use-of-force report.

This would be classified as threatening resistance even though an actual attack has not yet been launched. Another example could be verbal, with clearly communicated threats to commit harm. It is reasonable for use of force continuum officer to feel threatened under these circumstances and, therefore, could employ those tools from the Threatening Resistance category i.

A deadly resistant suspect will seriously injure or kill the officer or another person if immediate action is not taken to stop the threat.

Six Levels of Use of Force Continuum Flashcards Preview

The officer is justified in using force, including deadly use of force continuum, reasonably necessary to overcome the offender and effect custody. However, if 10 officers arrive at a scene with only a single suspect, the public may perceive the situation as an excessive use of officer presence within the use of force continuum.

The verbal command and the consequence must be legal and not considered excessive according to the continuum. For example, an officer could not order a disabled person in a wheel chair to stand up or be sprayed by Oleoresin Use of force continuum OC Pepper Spray.